Featured Topics
Retirement Industry
Magazine Archive
Education/Advice
Where Do you Go for Financial Advice?
Under the ERIP, an employee who retired at age 55 would get employer contributions for health and dental insurance until age 65, but an employee who retired after age 55 would not. The appellate court agreed with a district court ruling that the early retirement incentives are "facially discriminatory," and as such violate the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and that an early retirement incentive plan cannot condition its benefits based solely on age. The district court judge had ordered that employees and former employees are entitled to damages in the amount of health and dental insurance premiums that the Department of Corrections would have paid if the illegal early retirement plan had not existed from 2001 to the present (see Court Finds Early Retirement Incentive Discriminatory). The case is Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Minnesota Department of Corrections, 8th Cir., No. 10-2699.
Under the ERIP, an employee who retired at age 55 would get employer contributions for health and dental insurance until age 65, but an employee who retired after age 55 would not. The appellate court agreed with a district court ruling that the early retirement incentives are "facially discriminatory," and as such violate the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and that an early retirement incentive plan cannot condition its benefits based solely on age.
The district court judge had ordered that employees and former employees are entitled to damages in the amount of health and dental insurance premiums that the Department of Corrections would have paid if the illegal early retirement plan had not existed from 2001 to the present (see Court Finds Early Retirement Incentive Discriminatory).
Rebecca Mooreeditors@plansponsor.com
Copyright ©1989-2012 Asset International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. No Reproduction without Prior Authorization