Happy Holiday celebrations, PLANSPONSOR readers! As we focus on investing, studies show Americans are unsure about what stock market volatility will do to their plans for retirement, and pre-retirees and retirees may be unsuitably invested. Plan sponsors are still being questioned about their use of company stock in their retirement plans, and CVS won confirmation that its plan’s stable value fund was not improper. Institutional investors are seeing hope for good returns in focused strategies, and the active versus passive debate still lives on. Enjoy this edition of PLANSPONSOR Weekend!
The lawsuit alleges that Gannett Co., its benefit plans committee and other fiduciaries’ decision to concentrate plan investments in Gannett’s parent company common stock was a breach of their fiduciary duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and caused a loss of approximately $135 million.
Read more >
Steve Deschenes, product management and analytics director at Capital Group, says, “The active-passive debate is an industry discussion which distracts investors from what can have a real impact on their portfolios.”
Read more >
Commenting on the decision, Segal Consulting says it is “consistent with every other decision handed down in similar cases except for one,” the Southern District of New York Court’s decision in The New York Times Company v. Newspaper and Mail Deliverers’-Publishers’ Pension Fund, which is being appealed.