Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.
UK Private Equity Firm's Ethics High Despite Lack of Policy
The results of Grant Thornton Corporate Finance’s quarterly private equity barometer indicated less than a quarter (23%) of respondents believed ethical standards to be mixed and 3% branded them as poor, according to a Grant Thornton press release. Two thirds of respondents (66%) claimed their organization has an informal ethical code, while 7% admitted to having no written ethical rules.
When asked which sectors they would not invest in for ethical reasons, PE houses ranked pornography as number one (50%), followed by firearms/military (48%) and gambling investments (28%). Tobacco investments were cited by 22% of PE houses as being avoided, while 10% said they would not invest in companies dealing with alcohol, the press release said.
In addition, 63% of PE houses said they would avoid investing in any company with exploitative labor practices; 37% would not invest in a company with no social responsibility initiatives; nearly a third (32%) would be put off by firms with negative environmental effects; and 29% would avoid investing in a firm with negative health effects.
The PE survey also rebuffed the supposed notion that private equity houses only hold onto companies for as long as it takes to make a quick profit. The large majority of private equity firms (81%) now hold onto their investments for at least three years, while 40% retain their investments for four years or more. When asked directly whether they were “unethical asset strippers in for a quick buck”, more than half (52%) of PE executives said that was completely false, while a further 32% believed a handful of PE firms gave the industry a bad name.
In addition, 49% attacked the left wing press for pursuing its own agenda and criticizing the industry by focusing on too few examples.