Merrill Lynch Agrees to $75M ERISA Breach Suit Settlement

April 6, 2009 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - A federal judge has given preliminary approval to a proposed $75-million deal to settle claims Merrill Lynch violated its fiduciary responsibilities by keeping company stock in its retirement plans when its mortgage-related losses made it no longer prudent to do so.

Lawyers for the participants in the Merrill Lynch plans announced the deal that is scheduled for a final court consideration at a July 27, 2009, court hearing.

The settlement comes after a number of individual suits against Merrill Lynch were consolidated into one case, which focused on an 80% decline in the value of Merrill stock in the retirement plans between September 30, 2006, and December 31, 2008.

The plans involved in the court action are the:

  • Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan;
  • the Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Retirement Accumulation Plan; and
  • the Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan.

According to Monday’s announcement, the $75 million (minus attorney’s fees, administrative expenses and other charges) will be allocated to plan accounts of members of the class whose accounts suffered losses as the result of investing in Merrill Lynch stock during the class period.

The plaintiffs charged that having company stock in the plans was no longer prudent because, by June 29, 2007, the company had accumulated at least $43 billion of net exposure to “risky and illiquid” collateralized debt obligation (CDO) securities and subprime mortgages, which was greater than the company’s total equity value of $42 billion at that time.

According to plaintiffs’ court documents, “Merrill Lynch’s Company stock was not a suitable investment for the retirement accounts of its employees due to Merrill Lynch’s reckless business practices, including wagering the entire book value of the franchise on securities that were risky, illiquid and highly correlated. Merrill Lynch’s rush into the uncharted waters of purchasing and holding CDO and subprime related securities exposed the Company to unacceptable levels of risk…”

Court documents in the case related to the settlement are available  here .The settlement agreement is here .

«