Cerulli points out that analysts are now responsible for manager and strategy and determining the appropriateness of implementation of that strategy within a vehicle type.
According to a press release, highlights from the Cerulli report include:
- High turnover and lack of experience are the most frequent asset manager complaints about analysts in research and due diligence groups. Cerulli has found, however, that this perception of inexperience tends to be overstated.
- Quantitative measures are regularly the initial test for weeding out managers from product searches, even though qualitative measures are often of greater overall importance to sponsor due diligence groups.
- Cerulli analysts contend that due diligence teams will need to increase the focus on the balance sheets of asset managers to ensure the stability of the asset management firm and its employees.
In its Due Diligence issue Cerulli uses data from
its first quarter proprietary survey of sponsor research
and due diligence groups to provide insight into how
these groups are staffed and structured. It also examines
the process these groups use when evaluating managers for
acceptance onto platforms and provides metrics around
which factors play the largest role in determining who
makes the cut.
The second half of the issue contains updated data for the U.S. managed accounts industry through the end of the first quarter of 2009.
The Cerulli Edge—Managed Accounts Edition can be ordered from here .
« Getting Govt. Bailout Funds Doesn't Trigger 409A 'Change in Control'