Actuaries Top Outsource Source List

March 28, 2003 ( - When it comes to outsourcing, actuarial services were most likely to be performed by a third-party provider, according to a recent study by PLANSPONSOR and MassMutual Retirement Services.

In fact, more than 82% of 307 plan sponsor respondents chose to outsource those services to a third party, compared with just:

  • 8.4% that assigned that work to their bundled DB provider,
  • 4.2% that used their defined contribution provider, and
  • 5.0% that relied on in-house resources.

Trustee services were most likely to be assigned to respondents’ bundled DB provider, but only by 16.6%. DB administration was close behind, with 13.1% of the respondents giving that work to their bundled DB provider, and 12.9% using their bundled DB provider for investment management. Other services assigned to a bundled DB provider were:

  • 10.0% – advisory services
  • 9.5% – compliance
  • 9.2% – investment consulting
  • 7.3% – employee education
  • 6.3% – plan design
  • 3.7% – non-qualified plan

Design Signs

From a plan design perspective, 14.4% of respondents already have a cash balance plan, while a like 15.1% are considering adding or switching to such a program. However, more than 70% say they are not considering such a move.

Defined benefit plan concerns were, unsurprisingly, focused on investment returns, cited by a third of survey respondents, and funding (28.7%). Costs/fees were cited by 6.1%, while increasing participant satisfaction was a concern for just 3.2%.

Education/advice topped the list of defined contribution plan concerns, noted by 26% of survey respondents. Participant satisfaction was second on the list, cited by nearly one in five, followed closely by the 18.8% that were concerned about participation. Other concerns included:

  • 9.6% – investment options
  • 6.8% – costs/fees
  • 6.2% – compliance
  • 5.8% – other

The survey data is online at