Brad Kimler, Senior Vice President at Fidelity Employer Services Company, said the 7.5% increase kept in line with health care inflation last year. The annual Fidelity estimate that dates back to 2002 includes costs for Medicare Part B and D premiums – which are costs Medicare Part A does not cover – and supplemental insurance. The estimate does not account for long-term care costs.
Kimler attributed the increase to rising Medicare and health care costs.
The $215,000 is a 7.5% rise from Fidelity’s 2006 prediction that the same couple would need $200,000 to cover these costs (See Fidelity Estimates $200,000 Needed for Health Care in Retirement). The increase is below the 8.6% hike in 2005 – the greatest increase since Fidelity began making the predictions (See Fidelity: Estimated Retirement Health Costs Jump 8.6% ).
Kimler said in a conference call with reporters that he does not expect the amount to drop. He also said health savings accounts (HSAs) are one of the most effective and tax efficient ways employers are addressing the need for health coverage in retirement.
According to a press release from Fidelity, some of the changes that have made HSA’s more attractive include:
- The elimination of contribution limits that were previously tied to High Deductible Health Plan (HDHP) deductibles. In 2007, the new maximum contribution limits are $2,850 for individuals and $5,650 for families.
- The ability for employers to initiate a one-time rollover of funds from an individual’s health Flexible Spending Account (FSA) or Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA) to an HSA.
- Setting of annual statutory contribution limits earlier in the year (June 1) so employers can better prepare for annual enrollment.
Kimler said the reasons the $215,000 is startling are retirees do not consider health coverage in retirement as a primary planning objective and what they have accrued in their 401(k) accounts or other vehicles is much less than that.
Research by Fidelity also looked at how a $215,000 health care liability would affect retirees’ Social Security benefit, and found that a 65-year old earning $60,000 in the year he or she decides to retire can expect about half of his or her pre-tax Social Security benefit to be eaten up in health care expenses.
A summary of the study can be found at www.fidelity.com .