House Leaders Pull Comp Time Bill
>According to published reports, House GOP leaders
pulled the bill when their tallies showed it was heading to
defeat in the face of loud and forceful opposition from
labor unions.Under the bill, employers could let employees
choose between getting overtime pay or compensatory time
off, both calculated at a time-and-a-half rate. Employers
would be able to bar workers from taking days off that
would, in their judgment, unduly disrupt business.
With business lobbyists and the White House behind it, the
bill would amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 that
ensures that hourly, private-sector workers receive
time-and-a-half pay for overtime, accrued in the week it is
worked. The bill’s defenders said it would give workers
flexibility to spend more time with their families while
critics said it would have put heavy pressure on low-income
workers to forgo overtime pay to please employers,
though employer coercion was specifically barred
in the legislation.
Rounding Up Democrats
>According to the news reports, advocates of the bill
were unable to round up enough pro-business Democrats to
counter opposition from a sizable pro-labor bloc among the
228 House Republicans, said a spokeswoman for House
Majority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Missouri). “We never pass labor
bills without Democrat votes,” said spokeswoman Burson
Taylor. “And we weren’t going to have them this time for
whatever reason. The bill got postponed. We’ll try to bring
it up again.”
Twice in recent years, the Republican-led House has
approved similar comp-time legislation. In 1996 and 1997,
versions passed with backing from more than a dozen
crossover Democrats. Those efforts died in the Senate and
faced veto threats from President Clinton.
This time, sources said, only a handful of the 205 House
Democrats were for the bill, a faction led by
Representative Charles Stenholm of Texas. Another
breakaway Democrat was Representative Calvin Dooley of
Hanford, said Diego Arambula, a Dooley spokesman. The
centrist Dooley has also backed the Bush administration on
major trade bills, over labor objections.
Republican sponsors lashed out at their foes.
“Only in Washington could lobbyists and politicians
continue to get away with denying parents the freedom to
choose to spend more time with their children,” said
Representative Judy Biggert (R-Illinois), author of The
Family Time Flexibility Act, in a prepared statement. “I
can assure you that the fight to change this outdated
requirement on behalf of America’s working moms and dads is
not over. I have no doubt that truth will win out.”