Internal Managers Trump outside Pension Advisors
The study of 28 internally managed funds managing £158 billion pounds showed that the funds enjoyed lower risks, which resulted in higher average total returns. The study was undertaken by WM Company, a research firm.
According to WM, the majority of the internal funds
actively manage their UK equities. The funds produced a
0.3% average annual return over rolling three and five-year
Similar results apply for North American stocks, while European equities turned in a 0.2% average annual gain, again showing a “significantly lower dispersion of returns”, according to WM. The only area where outside managers triumphed was with Japan equities and UK bonds.
The funds held an average 212 UK stocks – much more than the average portfolio managed outside, WM said.
Lower Turnover Means Lower Cost
But the internal funds’ activity was much lower. Average portfolio turnover was 31% for internal UK equities, compared with 53% externally. For European equities the ratios were 74% versus 85%. For UK bonds the internal rate of change was at 82% compared with 141% for external.
WM said the lower portfolio turnover gives internally managed funds a strong advantage due to their lower cost base, it notes.
WM also point out that internal funds have a lower risk profile with an average tracking annual error of 1.6%, which is equivalent to the 75th percentile for external funds. This puts internal funds in the lowest quartile of riskiness.
Funds involved in the study represent a quarter of the UK pension market, compared with 46% 15 years ago. In 80% of these funds, six out of 10 members are either inactive workers or pensioners.
« ICMA Will Take mPower Advice 'Public'