Rakoff said the parties should be prepared for a possible trial beginning no later than February 1. After twice asking BofA and the SEC to come up with more information, Rakoff is still not content with the proposed settlement.
He wrote in his opinion that the $33-million settlement
was a “trivial penalty for a false statement that
materially infected a multi-billion-dollar merger,”
according to the AP.
The settlement “does not comport with the most
elementary notions of justice and morality,” Rakoff
The ruling forces the SEC to either rework the settlement or take the case to trial. Regulators could also drop the case entirely.
BofA is under scrutiny for $3.6 billion in bonuses paid to Merrill executives before the bank’s acquisition of Merrill Lynch. Neither company provided details of the bonuses to their shareholders, who voted on December 5 to approve the merger.
Last month the bank agreed to pay $33 million to settle SEC charges that BofA misled investors by authorizing the bonus payments.
The bank also faced a Monday deadline to provide more details about the bonuses to New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo.
« IRS Answers Questions on Taxability of Roth Conversions