The order directs the Labor Department, Treasury and SEC to reexamine guidance around alternatives, including cryptocurrency, in retirement plans to encourage wider adoption.
The Social Security Administration’s top actuary provided an estimate that the ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ will have ‘material effects’ on the funds’ financial status.
The organization requested the department reconsider its decision to rescind prior guidance, which it stated could slow the adoption of annuities in retirement plans.
The plaintiffs accuse the company of excessive recordkeeping fees and managed account charges, poor-performing funds and using forfeitures to offset employer contributions.
Three plan participants alleged 75% of the retirement plan’s $1.6 billion in assets under management was invested in poor-performing, low-rated, proprietary investments.
Filing after the Department of Labor’s amicus brief, Illinois plaintiffs allege that a grocery company violated its fiduciary duty by ‘failing to promptly exhaust forfeited funds.’