Responding to the Department of Labor’s (DOL) Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding lifetime income illustrations, the Institute urged the DOL to issue guidance expressly stating that furnishing lifetime income illustrations (1) is participant education, (2) will not constitute the provision of investment advice or any other fiduciary act under ERISA, and (3) does not constitute the offering or promise of any benefit under a plan.
The Institute is concerned that any mandate to furnish illustrations or conditions to a safe harbor that specify or appear to favor particular methodologies and assumptions will become the primary, or possibly the only, way plan sponsors will be willing to provide such illustrations and planning tools. “Despite the DOL’s good intentions, favoring certain methodologies or providing a narrow safe harbor may result in participants not being provided more robust information and tools that rely on other reasonable approaches, including some that allow participants to customize their information,” said SPARK General Counsel Larry Goldbrum in a comment letter.
SPARK is also concerned that the approach in the Notice will require service providers to make system changes that are inconsistent with current best practices, and will be burdensome and costly to accommodate. “The required changes will increase compliance costs that will ultimately be borne by participants,” Goldbrum added.
According to the letter, if the DOL concludes that a requirement to furnish illustrations is needed, it should be general and conceptual, and should be accompanied by a broad and flexible safe harbor that covers multiple approaches and forms of delivery. The illustration requirement and narrow safe harbor being contemplated by the DOL will not provide adequate protection for the plan, the plan sponsor, responsible plan fiduciaries or service providers from the increased risks of claims and lawsuits. “Although the Notice included a safe harbor, we continue to fear that the illustrations might be misinterpreted by participants as either a promise of what their benefits might be or a guarantee of benefits,” Goldbrum stated.
Additionally, most plan sponsors are generally not able to provide illustrations to participants without outside assistance and sophisticated systems. Service providers can help plan sponsors do this but are unwilling to assume the potential risk and liability that a safe harbor is intended to cover. Therefore, The SPARK Institute also requested that the DOL specifically extend any and all safe harbor protection to service providers in order to facilitate the process of plan sponsors being able to work with them.
The Institute also urged the DOL not to require illustrations to be provided on paper participant benefit statements, but to allow plan sponsors to provide illustrations to participants on their benefit statements, on separate reports, or by making them available on a continuous basis through a website with appropriate notice.
SPARK’s comments can be found at www.sparkinstitute.org/comments-and-materials.php.