2026
DC Survey: Plan Benchmarking

By studying trends in DC retirement program design and governance, sponsors can benchmark and potentially improve their own plans. This year’s report includes a new section on financial wellness programs.

Survey

Survey

Respondent Profile

Respondents, by Plan Type Offered

401(k)
55.4%
403(b)
5.5%
457
12.5%
ESOP1/KSOP2
2.3%
Profit-sharing
10.8%
MEP3/PEP4
1.0%
Money purchase
1.0%
NQDC5
6.3%
SIMPLE6/SEP7
0.9%
Other
4.4%
1Employee stock ownership plan.
2ESOP combined with a 401(k).
3Multiple employer plan.
4Pooled employer plan.
5Nonqualified deferred compensation plan.
6Savings incentive match plan for employees.
7Simplified employee pension plan.

Respondents, by Industry

Banking/Financial services
2.3%
Building/Construction/Contracting
4.7%
Government (all)
11.4%
Health care (all)
7.7%
Law firms
3.2%
Manufacturing
10.6%
Retail
4.0%
Technology/Telecommunications
4.4%
Wholesale/Distribution
3.5%
All other industries*
48.1%
*36 additional unique industries.




Plan Sizes

The 2026 DC Survey: Plan Benchmarking report shows that plans on the small end of the spectrum generally pay the largest investment fees—45.9% of plans with less than $5 million in assets had an average asset-weighted expense ratio of greater than 50 basis points, compared with 7.4% of plans with greater than $1 billion in assets, for example. Plan size not only affects cost, but influences plan design. The survey showed less than one-quarter (24.9%) of the smallest plans use automatic enrollment, as compared with nearly three-quarters (74.9%) of the largest plans. —RM

Uses Automatic Enrollment

<$5M
24.9%
$5M – $25M
42.2%
>$25M – $50M
57.7%
>$50M – $200M
69.4%
>$200M – $1B
72.5%
>$1B
74.9%

Uses an Investment Committee for DC Plan

<$5M
54.2%
$5M – $25M
79.3%
>$25M – $50M
93.8%
>$50M – $200M
96.9%
>$200M – $1B
98.7%
>$1B
97.9%

Average Asset-Weighted Expense Ratio of All Investment Options

<25 bps
25 – 50 bps
>50 bps
<$5M
19.6%
34.5%
45.9%
$5M – $25M
50.2%
33.7%
16.1%
>$25M – $50M
45.6%
33.0%
21.4%
>$50M – $200M
39.6%
43.5%
16.8%
>$200M – $1B
39.7%
42.9%
17.4%
>$1B
62.4%
30.2%
7.4%

Defined Contribution Plans, by Asset Range

<$5M
22.3%
$5M – $25M
32.5%
>$25M – $50M
12.4%
>$50M – $200M
16.1%
>$200M – $1B
10.5%
>$1B
6.3%




Plan Types

Given the history of 403(b)s as annuity-based plans and 457 plans often being sponsored by government entities accustomed to providing retirement income via defined benefit plans, these plan types are ahead of the game when it comes to offering retirement income help to participants, according to the 2026 DC Survey: Plan Benchmarking report. Nearly half (46.7%) of 457 plans and nearly one-quarter (24.4%) of 403(b)s offered in-plan retirement income products, compared with only 6.4% of 401(k)s. Additionally, 403(b) plan sponsors were the most likely among plan types to use measures of retirement income or income replacement goals to evaluate their DC plan’s success. —RM

Offers Systematic Withdrawals at Retirement

401(k)
48.5%
403(b)
69.1%
457
73.4%

Offers In-Plan Retirement Income Product/s

401(k)
6.4%
403(b)
24.4%
457
46.7%

Offers Immediate Eligibility Upon Hiring

401(k)
35.3%
403(b)
69.4%
457
51.5%

Offers Participants One-on-One Meetings With Financial Planner / Adviser Outside of the Plan

401(k)
22.5%
403(b)
42.8%
457
59.8%

Using Participation Rate/s to Assess Plan’s Success

401(k)
91.3%
403(b)
89.5%
457
88.0%

Using Average Deferral Rate/s to Assess Plan’s Success

401(k)
64.1%
403(b)
56.5%
457
45.7%

Using ‘% of Participants Meeting Retirement Income Goals’ to Assess Plan’s Success

401(k)
31.7%
403(b)
32.9%
457
31.5%

Using ‘% of Participants Meeting Retirement Income Replacement Ratio Goals’ to Assess Plan’s Success

401(k)
21.3%
403(b)
25.7%
457
20.4%

Using ‘% of Participants Employing Plan Advice Tools/Seminars’ to Assess Plan’s Success

401(k)
30.3%
403(b)
32.9%
457
25.7%




Contributions

According to the 2026 PLANSPONSOR DC Survey: Plan Benchmarking report, two-thirds of plan sponsors (66.6%) responded that they match employee deferrals, while nearly half (49.6%) said they make a nonelective or profit-sharing contribution. As for employee deferrals, the biggest percentage of DC plan sponsors (33.7%) reported still using a default deferral rate with automatic enrollment of about 3%, although the percentage of plan sponsors using a rate of about 6%, as is more recommended, grew to 23.3%, up from 18.7% in the prior survey. —RM

Offers Nonelective or Profit-Sharing Contributions

  • Yes
  • No
  • Unsure

Profit-Sharing / Nonmatching Structure

“Pro-rata” profit-sharing plan
6.6%
“New comparability” profit-sharing plan
3.5%
“Age-weighted” profit-sharing plan
0.3%
“Fixed-dollar” profit-sharing plan
1.1%
Nonelective safe harbor contribution
6.1%
Other
27.0%
Unsure
55.4%

Profit-Sharing / Nonmatching Contribution Rates

<3%
16.0%
3%
15.2%
>3% – 5%
20.8%
>5% – 7%
6.3%
>7% – 10%
7.5%
>10%
6.2%
Other
28.1%

Offers Matching Contributions

  • Yes
  • No
  • Unsure

Default Deferral Rate as a Percentage of Salary/Wages

1% – 2%
8.5%
2.1% – 3%
33.7%
3.1% – 4%
12.3%
4.1% – 5%
15.0%
5.1% – 6%
23.3%
>6%
2.5%
Other
4.7%




Employer Match

Offering an employer matching contribution in defined contribution plans can incentivize employee participation. Match eligibility periods and vesting schedules that favor plan participants can be further incentives and can be used for employee attraction, depending on plan sponsor goals. The 2026 DC Survey: Plan Benchmarking report shows that 59.1% of DC plan sponsors tie match eligibility to plan eligibility, and 25.4% of DC Survey respondents reported that participants are immediately 100% vested. —RM

When Participants Are Eligible for Match

Immediately once eligible for plan
59.1%
Eligible participants must wait up to 1 year
14.4%
Eligible participants must wait 1 year or more
9.5%
Unsure
16.9%

When Participants Are 100% Vested

Immediately upon enrollment
25.4%
1 year or less
3.1%
2 years
5.3%
3 years
8.5%
4 years
3.4%
5 years
11.6%
More than 5 years
17.6%
Unsure
25.0%

Matching Contributions Vesting Schedule

Cliff – 100% vested at a designated time of service
26.9%
Graded – Vested in increasing amounts over time
45.2%
Unsure
27.9%

Percentage of Active Participants Taking Full Advantage of the Maximum Employer Match

≥90%
16.3%
≥75%
16.9%
>50% – <75%
10.5%
>25% – <50%
5.6%
10% – 25%
1.8%
<10%
1.3%
Unsure
47.6%




Highest and Lowest, by Industry

Below, we showcase the highest and lowest responses for some metrics from the 51 industries represented in the 2025 DC Survey. Highest and lowest are not always accurate measures of plan success, as there can be several reasonable factors that go into the numbers. Higher participation rates and average account balances can be expected from industries that pay higher salaries. High employee turnover likely explains low participation rates in the restaurant and food services industry, while the availability of defined benefit plans contributes to the low DC plan participation rate for the government/public works sector. —RM

Participation Rate

1 Biotech 86.9%
2 Telecommunications 86.5%
3 Pharmaceuticals 85.4%
4 Accounting, CPA firms and financial planning 83.4%
5 Chemicals and mining 80.5%
46 Government/Public works – County, state and federal 61.0%
47 Social services 60.9%
48 Consumer services 58.8%
49 Restaurants and food service 57.5%
50 Religious organizations 55.1%

Average Account Balance

1 Law firms $338,622
2 Airlines and travel $232,440
3 Financial services $214,992
4 Health care organizations (for-profit) $197,693
5 Accounting, CPA firms and financial planning $195,248
46 Hotels, gaming, entertainment and hospitality $75,690
47 Health care organizations (not-for-profit) $74,412
48 Social services $68,702
49 Government/Public works – County, state and federal $61,322
50 Government/Public works – City and municipal $54,002

Average Deferral Rate

1 Government/Public works – City and municipal 15.5%
2 Government/Public works – County, state and federal 11.0%
3 Aerospace and defense 9.9%
4 Printing 9.6%
5 Utilities 9.3%
46 Retail 5.4%
47 Equipment – Sales, leasing and service 5.3%
48 Agriculture 4.8%
49 Consumer services 4.5%
50 E-Commerce 3.4%

Immediate Eligibility

1 Religious organizations 78.9%
2 Aerospace and defense 65.1%
3 Education – Higher ed 64.4%
4 Biotech 59.1%
5 Chemicals and mining 57.1%
46 Printing 23.1%
47 Consumer services 22.6%
48 Real estate 22.4%
49 Restaurants and food service 21.3%
50 Wholesale 17.7%

Immediate Vesting

1 Manufacturing – Industrial products 70.9%
2 Religious organizations 64.3%
3 Education – Higher ed 61.5%
4 Pharmaceuticals 57.1%
5 Membership organizations, industry associations and labor unions 43.3%
46 Government/Public works – County, state and federal 16.0%
47 E-Commerce 12.9%
48 Architecture 12.1%
49 Government/Public works – City and municipal 10.3%
50 Advertising and marketing 8.7%



Financial Wellness

A major new component of the 2025 DC Survey explored financial wellness offerings. Historically considered optional, these benefits are increasingly integrated into retirement programs—and even reflected in federal law. In the 2026 DC Survey: Plan Benchmarking report, we note that a little more than one-third (34.8%) of plan sponsors reported offering an integrated financial wellness program. Respondents reported that the primary benefit of converging financial, physical and mental wellness programs is improved employee satisfaction, reported by 66.0%.

The survey also asked about obstacles to offering a financial wellness program, the most valuable resources within a program and measuring program success, among other things. These findings and more will be available for purchase soon. —RM

Use an Integrated Financial Wellness Program

  • Yes
  • No

Primary Benefit Seen From Converging Financial, Physical and Mental Wellness Programs

  • Improved employee satisfaction
  • Better employee retention
  • Increased productivity
  • Cost savings
  • Other



Powerful DC Benchmarking at Your Fingertips —
2026 PLANSPONSOR Industry Reports Now Available

Tap into 125+ pages of PLANSPONSOR’s proprietary DC Survey data, including comprehensive benchmarking tables across 9 plan types and 51 industries. These reports deliver clarity and comparison points that professionals need to evaluate and improve plan design.

Purchase the reports to:
  • Compare plans by industry and asset size
  • Equip advisers and internal teams with reliable data
  • Strengthen strategic planning with industry specific insights
  • Identify design improvements that enhance participant outcomes

AVAILABLE FOR PURCHASE NOW!

Contact Advertise / Advertise@ISSMediaSolutions.com

Subject to licensing agreement.