Tag: Litigation
Third Participant Challenges JP Morgan 401(k)
The text of the suit offers a detailed look at the investment menu offered to JP Morgan employees, as well...
JP Morgan 401(k) Plan Challenged Again
Plaintiffs argue that, instead of acting for the exclusive benefit of the plan and its participants and beneficiaries, “defendants acted...
ERISA Attorneys Busy Analyzing Fiduciary Rule Delay
The move from DOL this week was not an extension of the applicability date of the fiduciary rule, just a...
American Century Self-Dealing Complaint Advances
A district court judge in Missouri has denied American Century’s motion for dismissal of a lawsuit accusing the firm of...
Trump Administration Hits Hurdle In Fiduciary Fight
While a new OMB determination seemingly makes it more burdensome for the Trump administration to unravel the DOL fiduciary rulemaking,...
Judge Denies Oracle’s Motion to Dismiss 401(k) Fee Lawsuit
Court Victories Add to Confusion Over Fate of Fiduciary Rule
Though courts are supporting the DOL, actions from the Trump administration may mean those victories do not matter.
T. Rowe Price Latest Target of Self-Dealing Lawsuit
New York Life Agrees to Settle Self-Dealing Suit
UC Regents Sued for Interference of Benefits
The lawsuit also contends the defendant or its employees “discriminated against and/or harassed plaintiff on the basis of her age...
DOL Fiduciary Rule Wins Another Court Victory
TIAA Faces Suit Over 403(b) Plan Participant Loans
CVS Participants’ Second Attempt to Sue Over Stable Value Fund Fails
Case About Domestic Partner’s Right to Pension Proceeds
Aon Hewitt Targeted in Kickback Lawsuit Filed by Caterpillar Plan Participants
Edward Jones’ Attempt to Dismiss Self-Dealing Suit Denied
DOL Fiduciary Reform Effort Losing Steam
Advisers and service providers to defined contribution plans have spent millions of dollars pushing toward compliance with conflict of interest...
Self-Dealing Suit Challenges Fees and Fund Monitoring
Fiduciary Ordered to Give Up Cars to Restore Plan Losses
A federal court found that no amount of judgements from previous decisions had been satisfied.