Projected savings targets needed so that the American elderly can cover their health care costs in retirement continue to decline, in part because of enhanced prescription drug coverage provided by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), EBRI finds.
Savings targets declined between 2% and 10% between 2013 and 2014, according to the EBRI report, an update of previous computer modeling of retiree health savings needs. For a married couple both with drug expenses at the 90th percentile throughout retirement who wanted a 90% chance of having enough money saved for health care expenses in retirement by age 65, targeted savings fell from $360,000 in 2013, to $326,000 in 2014.
In 2014, a man would need $64,000 in savings and a woman would need $83,000 if each had a goal of having a 50% chance of having enough money saved to cover health care expenses in retirement. If either instead wanted a 90% chance of having enough savings, $116,000 would be needed for a man and $131,000 would be needed for a woman.
As the report notes, Medicare beneficiaries can expect to pay a share of their costs out of pocket because of program deductibles and other cost sharing. In 2011, Medicare covered 62% of the cost of health care services for Medicare beneficiaries ages 65 and older, while out-of-pocket spending accounted for 13%, and private insurance covered 15%.
Medicare was never designed to cover health care expenses in full. Individuals older than age 65 have to pay for their own deductibles for inpatient and outpatient services, as well as for uninsured costs of outpatient prescription drugs, says Paul Fronstin, director of EBRI’s Health Research and Education Program, and lead author of the report.
As the EBRI report notes, when outpatient prescription drugs were added as an optional benefit under Medicare, the program included a then-controversial coverage gap known as the so-called donut hole. The ACA included provisions to reduce the size of this coverage gap. By 2020, enrollees will pay 25% of the cost of prescription drugs when they are in the coverage gap for both generic and brand-name drugs.
However, Fronstin notes, regardless of the effects of the ACA, individuals may pay a greater share of their overall costs in the future because of the combination of the financial condition of the Medicare program and cutbacks to employment-based retiree health programs.
Projections of savings needed to cover out-of-pocket expenses for prescription drugs are highly dependent on the assumptions used for drug utilization, EBRI points out, which is why the analysis provides three sets of estimates: prescription drug use is at the median (midpoint, half above and half below) throughout retirement; prescription drug use at the 75th percentile throughout retirement; and in prescription drug use is at the 90th percentile throughout retirement.
Many individuals will need more than the amounts cited in this report, Fronstin says, because it does not factor in the savings needed to meet long-term care expenses or take into account that many individuals retire before becoming eligible for Medicare. However, some workers will need to save less than what is reported if they choose to work past age 65, thereby postponing enrollment in Medicare Parts B and D if they receive health benefits as active workers.
“Amount of Savings Needed for Health Expenses for People Eligible for Medicare: Good News Not So Rare Anymore” is in the October EBRI Notes, online at www.ebri.org.