U.S. District Judge Noel L. Hillman of the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey ruled that Section 401(k) of the federal tax code gave Beiliang Loh of Vineland, New Jersey, no right to bring suit to enforce the statute as a private party. Loh represented himself in the proceedings.
Loh’s suit charged that the employer, Whibco Inc., removed $8,396 from his plan account after an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) agent notified Whibco that Loh’s annual contribution for 2007 was higher than 15% of his compensation, so it was not permitted under the rules of the Whibco, Inc., Non-Union Retirement Plan. Loh sued the company and the IRS agent, and sought a court order to return the money to his account and $350 to repay his federal court filing fee.
Lou argued that the court should interpret Section 401(k) of the tax code in a manner that does not “demonstrate prejudice against lower salaried workers who wish to make a greater contribution to their retirement accounts.”
After defendants asked Hillman to throw out Loh’s suit, Loh said in court papers that as an “express[ion] [of his] cooperation and kindness,” he will “voluntarily reduce” his “request of the return amount to [his] 401(k) account from $8,396.00 to the catch-up amount of $5,000.”
In deciding the case, Hillman noted that the IRS is charged with making and enforcing tax rules and that its interpretation of those rules is entitled to deference. Wrote Hillman: “The Court, therefore, will not substitute its opinion for that of the IRS and overturn its regulation establishing employer-provided limits.”
The case is Loh v. Richardson-Browne, D.N.J., No. 10-0054 (NLH).