“Any realistic assessment of a pension plan should include several measures, not just one,” said Senior Pension Fellow Don Fuerst. “Somehow 80% has become a perceived standard but that is a myth we need to replace with facts.”
In a new Issue Brief, “The 80% Pension Funding Standard Myth,” the Academy said understanding a pension plan’s funding progress should not be reduced to a single measure or benchmark at any single point in time.
Multiple funding ratios should be examined over several years to determine trends, and other factors should be considered when assessing fiscal soundness including: the size of the pension obligation compared to the financial resources of the sponsor, the financial health of the plan sponsor, the funding or contribution policy of the plan and the investment strategy and risk level of the plan assets.
“The 80% myth can lead to a dangerous slippery slope,” Fuerst added. “It could evolve into an inadequate target if not challenged. Pension plans should have a strategy in place to attain or maintain a funded status of 100% or greater over a reasonable period of time.”
The report is available here.