For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.
High Court Denies Move to Stop San Francisco Health Care Law
The Golden Gate Restaurant Association, in November 2006, filed a legal challenge to the ordinance mandating covered employers make required health care expenditures to or on behalf of covered employees, claiming the ordinance is preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). A U. S. District Court judge ruled in favor of the employer groups and filed an injunction barring implementation of the rule.
In January, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals blocked the injunction concluding the ordinance does not require employers to establish ERISA plans or to make changes to any existing ERISA plans and does not require that employers provide certain health care benefits to their employees, through an ERISA plan or in any other way (See Appellate Court Clears Roadblock to SF Health Care Law ).
According to Business Insurance, the Association had sought an order to prevent enforcement of the 2006 ordinance until the appellate court’s final ruling. Kennedy denied the request without comment.
You Might Also Like:
BrightPlan Unveils New Solutions to HR Challenges
Increasing Health Care Costs Have Implications for Retirement Savings
Mercer-Vanguard Health Savings Model Urges Personalized Planning
« Life Inspires Comedy: "Dilbert" Pokes Fun at "Dilbert" Firing