>With a notice that states that it will soon issue regulations on the new definition – but that employers should rely on the ruling in the notice in the meantime – the IRS asserted that the Section 152 definition of a dependent does not apply to employer-provided medical care reimbursements or premiums, according to a BNA report.
>The IRS said that the Act contained a conforming amendment to Section 105(b), which would exclude from an employee’s salary the reimbursements and premiums paid to an employee for medical expenses. This would apply to the employee, the employee’s spouse, and other dependents. The conforming amendment states that a person’s dependent status for Section 105(b) would be determined without regard to certain parts of the amended Section 152. Thus, the IRS states that Congress did not alter the definition of dependent for these specific payments, according to BNA.
>Section 106(a), however, did not contain an amendment, and the section should be revised to provide the same definition of dependent as is seen in Section 105(b). Congresses intent was not to alter the definition with regards to employer-provided health plans, the IRS stated, and thus employers should note that Section 106 was not clear on this subject.
>The revised regulation would be applicable beginning after December 31 of this year.
« Gun Control?