PLANSPONSOR Magazine

Insights |November - December 2024

A Universal Challenge

I was recently in Australia visiting our Sydney-based media team. It likely isn’t a surprise to you that folks Down...
Participant Analysis |November - December 2024

‘Wellness’ Could Be a Key to Saving

How can plan sponsors support plan participants in improving their retirement outcomes? Considering that, according to the 2024 PLANSPONSOR Plan...
Rules/Regs |November - December 2024

More From Washington and the Courts

IRS’ Tax Inflation Adjustments for 2025; DOL Clarifies Scope of Cybersecurity Guidance; Nearly 900 Firms Register With DOL Under Amended...
UpFront |November - December 2024

Public DB Plans Embrace Private Alts

With a growing incentive to invest in private markets, public pension funds have shifted their asset allocations dramatically over the...
UpFront |November - December 2024

‘The U.S. Still Needs Pensions’

The continuing decline in the number and quality of defined benefit pension plans in the U.S. is not only disproportionately...
UpFront |November - December 2024

Income Solution Fees: A Primer

As more plan sponsors consider incorporating lifetime income options into their retirement offerings—and more such options come to market—these sponsors...
UpFront |November - December 2024

Tidbits

More than half of all peak Baby Boomers—those born 1959 through 1964—have assets of $250,000 or less so will likely...
Investments |November - December 2024

Build and Equip

Both company and public plan committees need diversity, good education.
Total Benefits |November - December 2024

SECURE 2.0’s New Match

The IRS speaks to matching student loan payments through the plan.
Plan Design |November - December 2024

Counting the Costs

Even with the fees, a 401(k) is a good investment for participant savings.
Fiduciary Forum |November - December 2024

A Provision Review

Where does the company plan stand in terms of SECURE 2.0?
Inside Angle |November - December 2024

SCOTUS to Decide

The Supreme Court's ruling in Cunningham v. Cornell will determine how the courts treat prohibited transaction pleadings.