Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.
Judge Won't Certify Discrimination Class Action Suit
US District Judge J. Curtis Joyner ruled that while the 10 named plaintiffs share legal issues with a potential class of up to 200 other black workers at Aramark Corp., those issues aren’t the key ones in the case, according to a Legal Intelligencer report.
“It is clear from the complaint that while all of the plaintiffs aver that they were ‘subjected to frequent harassment and unjustified disciplinary sanctions by Caucasian supervisors not imposed on similarly situated Caucasian employees,’ the circumstances under which those acts of discrimination were committed and the resultant injuries are unique to each individual plaintiff,” Joyner wrote. “The plaintiffs’ individual claims for damages would therefore require individualized evaluations and findings of the facts and defenses.”
Joyner also found that the plaintiffs couldn’t show that common questions “predominate over any questions affecting only individual members” and that class resolution is “superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy,” the Intelligencer said.
The Aramark plaintiffs failed the test, Joyner said, because their harassment claims and the damages they seek would require “individualized evaluations.”
Plaintiffs: Unfair Discipline
The suit was filed in August 2001
on behalf of 10 service workers employed by Aramark at
the Presbyterian Medical Center in Philadelphia,
according to the Intelligencer
story. Philadelphia-based Aramark is the nation’s
largest provider of outsourcing services
The suit alleges that the Aramark
service workers at Presbyterian – whose jobs include
transporting patients, distributing linen and cleaning
rooms and floors – are almost all black and that their
white managers harass them through “an oppressive pattern
of unfair and unjustified discipline.”
Four of the named plaintiffs claim
they were fired on the basis of fabricated disciplinary
charges. The real reason for the firings, the suit says,
is that all four had voiced objections to the racially
discriminatory discipline.
The suit alleges that Aramark
employees in other departments at the hospital, who are
mostly white, are not subjected to the same
discipline.