Six judges elected to California superior courts in 2012 claim in a lawsuit that putting them in a new pension plan effectively reduced their compensation, which violates the state constitution.
The lawsuit states that the Public Employees Pension Reform Act was unfairly and retroactively applied to judges who were elected to the bench before the enactment of the law in 2013. The judges have sued the state, the state controller, the Judicial Council and the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS), according to Courthouse News Service.
The judges were members of Judges Retirement System II (JRSII) when the law became active January 1, 2013, and changed the terms of their membership. “It increased petitioners’ salary withholdings, permitted reductions to petitioners’ salaries during their terms of office in violation of the Constitution, and diminished the pension benefits they are entitled to earn,” the judges claim, according to the news report.
Instead of a salary withholding capped at 8%, the judges say they learned they would have to pay an additional 6% of the annual cost of funding their pensions. They claim the California Constitution forbids any reduction of the salary of an elected official while in office.
The judges say they spent considerable time and money winning office, and wound down their law practices based in part on their understanding of the compensation at their courts. They seek declaratory judgment and writ of mandate ordering the state to reinstate the terms of their pension and to refund the contributions they say they have overpaid.