For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.
Benefits July 9, 2003
Ex-Polaroid Workers Claim Illegal Benefits Cutoff
July 9, 2003 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - Five former
Polaroid employees have sued the company, claiming that
Polaroid violated ERISA by severing their long-term
disability benefits last year.
Reported by
Fred Schneyer
The suit, filed Monday in Boston federal court, claims Polaroid made the illegal benefits cutoff after the July 2002 sale of the company to One Equity Partners, a unit of Chicago-based Bank One Corp., according to the Associated Press.
The company sent a letter telling about 180 employees receiving long-term disability and 70 surviving spouses, that they would no longer be considered employees. The plaintiffs include a man with incurable skin cancer and a woman with Alzheimer’s. They have asked the court to restore their benefits, reimburse insurance premiums, and pay damages.
You Might Also Like:
11th Circuit Revives ERISA Suit Over Royal Caribbean Retirement Plan Investments
According to the appellate court’s ruling, ERISA plaintiffs do not always need an ‘apples-to-apples’ investment benchmark to demonstrate imprudence.
ERISA Claims Against Independence Administrators Survive Dismissal Bid
A Philadelphia judge found Aramark plausibly alleged its health-plan administrator acted as a fiduciary.
Part of 3M ERISA Suit Survives After Judge Finds Fidelity Funds Fit as Benchmark
A Minnesota federal judge allowed claims of target-date-fund imprudence and self-dealing to proceed, while narrowing other theories.
