Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.
Compliance June 29, 2010
Fiduciary Breach Case Filed Too Late
June 29, 2010 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – A federal appellate court has ruled that a woman who sued over allegations of a fiduciary breach in connection with her deceased husband’s individual retirement account filed the case too late.
Reported by
Fred Schneyer
The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the case against Chase Investment Services Inc. was governed by the three-year statute of limitations in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and not the state of Oklahoma’s five-year limit for breach of contract cases.
Plaintiff Suzanne Russell charged in the suit that Chase committed the ERISA breach by allowing her husband’s lawyer to drain the IRA of funds. Russell knew about the attorney’s actions in July 2005, so the June 2009 lawsuit was filed after the legal deadline in ERISA, the appellate court said.
The case is Russell vs. Chase Investment Services, 10th Circ., No. 10-5016.
You Might Also Like:
11th Circuit Revives ERISA Suit Over Royal Caribbean Retirement Plan Investments
According to the appellate court’s ruling, ERISA plaintiffs do not always need an ‘apples-to-apples’ investment benchmark to demonstrate imprudence.
ERISA Claims Against Independence Administrators Survive Dismissal Bid
A Philadelphia judge found Aramark plausibly alleged its health-plan administrator acted as a fiduciary.
Part of 3M ERISA Suit Survives After Judge Finds Fidelity Funds Fit as Benchmark
A Minnesota federal judge allowed claims of target-date-fund imprudence and self-dealing to proceed, while narrowing other theories.
